Libya vs Malaysia: Key media freedoms

Libya
0.061
in 2025
Malaysia
-0.017
in 2025
Libya rank
105th
Malaysia rank
107th

Key media freedoms over time

  • Libya
  • Malaysia
-3-2-1012190019622025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.061 against -0.017 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.078.

That makes Libya's figure about 3.6 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Malaysia ahead.

Libya ranks 105th and Malaysia ranks 107th of 175 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Malaysia Difference Ahead
1930s -2.57 -2.41 0.158 Malaysia
1940s -2.57 -2.41 0.158 Malaysia
1950s -0.454 -1.7 1.25 Libya
1960s -0.468 -1.7 1.23 Libya
1970s -2.52 -1.7 0.819 Malaysia
1980s -2.52 -1.76 0.7588 Malaysia
1990s -2.52 -2 0.518 Malaysia
2000s -2.52 -1.04 1.48 Malaysia
2010s 0.7574 -0.4977 1.26 Libya
2020s 0.6623 -0.0282 0.6905 Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Libya or Malaysia?
Libya, at 0.061 against -0.017 in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Libya and Malaysia?
0.078, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Malaysia?
83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
How do Libya and Malaysia rank globally for key media freedoms?
Libya ranks 105th and Malaysia ranks 107th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.