Kenya vs Mauritius: Key media freedoms

Kenya
1.72
in 2025
Mauritius
1.67
in 2025
Kenya rank
36th
Mauritius rank
38th

Key media freedoms over time

  • Kenya
  • Mauritius
-2-1012190019622025

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 1.72 against 1.67 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.05.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Mauritius ahead.

Kenya ranks 36th and Mauritius ranks 38th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Mauritius Difference Ahead
1900s -2.37 1.02 3.39 Mauritius
1910s -2.37 0.6406 3.01 Mauritius
1920s -2.37 1.03 3.4 Mauritius
1930s -2.37 0.9514 3.32 Mauritius
1940s -1.98 0.7278 2.71 Mauritius
1950s -1.84 1.39 3.24 Mauritius
1960s -1.23 1.28 2.5 Mauritius
1970s -0.965 0.0222 0.9872 Mauritius
1980s -1.58 1.04 2.62 Mauritius
1990s -0.1374 1.33 1.47 Mauritius
2000s 0.6958 1.35 0.6588 Mauritius
2010s 1.25 1.14 0.1056 Kenya
2020s 1.27 -0.3892 1.66 Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Kenya or Mauritius?
Kenya, at 1.72 against 1.67 in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Kenya and Mauritius?
0.05, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mauritius?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Kenya and Mauritius rank globally for key media freedoms?
Kenya ranks 36th and Mauritius ranks 38th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.