Comoros vs Singapore: Key media freedoms
Comoros
-0.156
in 2025
Singapore
-0.183
in 2025
Comoros rank
110th
Singapore rank
113th
Key media freedoms over time
- Comoros
- Singapore
How they compare
Comoros currently reports -0.156 against -0.183 in Singapore, a difference of 0.027.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Singapore ahead.
Comoros ranks 110th and Singapore ranks 113th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 4 and Singapore in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -1.3 | 0.091 | 1.4 | Singapore |
| 1910s | -1.3 | 0.091 | 1.4 | Singapore |
| 1940s | -0.9715 | 0.091 | 1.06 | Singapore |
| 1950s | -0.875 | 0.091 | 0.966 | Singapore |
| 1960s | -0.875 | 0.206 | 1.08 | Singapore |
| 1970s | -1.49 | -0.171 | 1.32 | Singapore |
| 1980s | -1.09 | -0.171 | 0.9198 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 0.0218 | 0.004 | 0.0178 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.0482 | 0.0065 | 0.0417 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.2794 | -0.1761 | 0.4555 | Comoros |
| 2020s | -0.1673 | -0.3863 | 0.219 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher key media freedoms, Comoros or Singapore?
- Comoros, at -0.156 against -0.183 in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in key media freedoms between Comoros and Singapore?
- 0.027, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Singapore?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Singapore rank globally for key media freedoms?
- Comoros ranks 110th and Singapore ranks 113th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.