Chile vs Vanuatu: Key media freedoms

Chile
2.65
in 2025
Vanuatu
2.45
in 2025
Chile rank
13th
Vanuatu rank
16th

Key media freedoms over time

  • Chile
  • Vanuatu
-202181219182025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 2.65 against 2.45 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.2.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Vanuatu's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 13th and Vanuatu ranks 16th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 11 and Vanuatu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1900s 0.057 -0.086 0.143 Chile
1910s 0.057 -0.086 0.143 Chile
1920s 0.057 -0.086 0.143 Chile
1930s 0.3629 -0.086 0.4489 Chile
1940s 0.7016 -0.086 0.7876 Chile
1950s 0.536 -0.086 0.622 Chile
1960s 0.881 -0.086 0.967 Chile
1970s -1.09 -0.086 1 Vanuatu
1980s -2.29 2.08 4.37 Vanuatu
1990s 2.47 2.08 0.3938 Chile
2000s 2.68 2.08 0.6054 Chile
2010s 2.59 2.09 0.5044 Chile
2020s 2.01 1.88 0.1278 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Chile or Vanuatu?
Chile, at 2.65 against 2.45 in Vanuatu as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Chile and Vanuatu?
0.2, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Vanuatu?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Chile and Vanuatu rank globally for key media freedoms?
Chile ranks 13th and Vanuatu ranks 16th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.