Belgium vs Denmark: Key media freedoms

Belgium
3.49
in 2025
Denmark
3.26
in 2025
Belgium rank
1st
Denmark rank
2nd

Key media freedoms over time

  • Belgium
  • Denmark
-2024190019622025

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 3.49 against 3.26 in Denmark, a difference of 0.23.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 2nd of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 8 and Denmark in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Denmark Difference Ahead
1900s 2.22 1.62 0.597 Belgium
1910s 1.32 1.65 0.3376 Denmark
1920s 2.22 1.93 0.286 Belgium
1930s 2.22 1.22 1 Belgium
1940s 0.959 0.5544 0.4046 Belgium
1950s 2.32 3.26 0.938 Denmark
1960s 2.32 3.26 0.938 Denmark
1970s 2.32 3.26 0.938 Denmark
1980s 2.32 3.26 0.938 Denmark
1990s 3.49 3.26 0.231 Belgium
2000s 3.49 3.26 0.231 Belgium
2010s 3.49 3.26 0.231 Belgium
2020s 3.49 3.26 0.231 Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Belgium or Denmark?
Belgium, at 3.49 against 3.26 in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Belgium and Denmark?
0.23, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Denmark?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Denmark rank globally for key media freedoms?
Belgium ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 2nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.