Belarus vs Myanmar: Key media freedoms

Belarus
-2.82
in 2025
Myanmar
-2.95
in 2025
Belarus rank
172nd
Myanmar rank
173rd

Key media freedoms over time

  • Belarus
  • Myanmar
-3-2-101190019622025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -2.82 against -2.95 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.13.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Myanmar ahead.

Belarus ranks 172nd and Myanmar ranks 173rd of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Myanmar Difference Ahead
1900s -0.912 -0.179 0.733 Myanmar
1910s -1.31 -0.179 1.13 Myanmar
1920s -2.55 -0.179 2.37 Myanmar
1930s -2.55 -0.179 2.37 Myanmar
1940s -2.55 -0.4426 2.11 Myanmar
1950s -2.55 0.37 2.92 Myanmar
1960s -2.55 -1.65 0.902 Myanmar
1970s -2.55 -2.08 0.471 Myanmar
1980s -2.19 -2.08 0.1082 Myanmar
1990s -0.0002 -2.08 2.08 Belarus
2000s -1.7 -2.08 0.3814 Belarus
2010s -1.82 0.0568 1.88 Myanmar
2020s -2.78 -2.29 0.485 Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Belarus or Myanmar?
Belarus, at -2.82 against -2.95 in Myanmar as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Belarus and Myanmar?
0.13, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Myanmar?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Myanmar rank globally for key media freedoms?
Belarus ranks 172nd and Myanmar ranks 173rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.