Belarus vs Eritrea: Key media freedoms

Belarus
-2.82
in 2025
Eritrea
-2.98
in 2025
Belarus rank
172nd
Eritrea rank
174th

Key media freedoms over time

  • Belarus
  • Eritrea
-3-2-101190019622025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports -2.82 against -2.98 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.16.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 172nd and Eritrea ranks 174th of 175 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 8 and Eritrea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Eritrea Difference Ahead
1900s -0.912 -1.6 0.689 Belarus
1910s -1.31 -1.6 0.2942 Belarus
1920s -2.55 -1.6 0.951 Eritrea
1930s -2.55 -1.77 0.779 Eritrea
1940s -2.55 -0.2884 2.26 Eritrea
1950s -2.55 -0.8336 1.72 Eritrea
1960s -2.55 -2.15 0.4002 Eritrea
1970s -2.55 -2.69 0.135 Belarus
1980s -2.19 -2.9 0.7098 Belarus
1990s -0.0002 -1.03 1.03 Belarus
2000s -1.7 -2.37 0.6715 Belarus
2010s -1.82 -2.7 0.8792 Belarus
2020s -2.78 -2.9 0.1218 Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Belarus or Eritrea?
Belarus, at -2.82 against -2.98 in Eritrea as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Belarus and Eritrea?
0.16, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eritrea?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Eritrea rank globally for key media freedoms?
Belarus ranks 172nd and Eritrea ranks 174th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.