Austria vs Vanuatu: Key media freedoms

Austria
2.51
in 2025
Vanuatu
2.45
in 2025
Austria rank
15th
Vanuatu rank
16th

Key media freedoms over time

  • Austria
  • Vanuatu
-10123190019622025

How they compare

Austria currently reports 2.51 against 2.45 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.06.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 101 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 15th and Vanuatu ranks 16th of 175 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1910s 1.16 -0.086 1.24 Austria
1920s 1.47 -0.086 1.56 Austria
1930s 0.0063 -0.086 0.0923 Austria
1940s 1.22 -0.086 1.3 Austria
1950s 1.96 -0.086 2.05 Austria
1960s 2.61 -0.086 2.7 Austria
1970s 2.61 -0.086 2.7 Austria
1980s 2.61 2.08 0.533 Austria
1990s 2.61 2.08 0.533 Austria
2000s 2.61 2.08 0.533 Austria
2010s 2.35 2.09 0.2618 Austria
2020s 2.56 1.88 0.6762 Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key media freedoms, Austria or Vanuatu?
Austria, at 2.51 against 2.45 in Vanuatu as of 2025.
What is the difference in key media freedoms between Austria and Vanuatu?
0.06, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Vanuatu?
101 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Austria and Vanuatu rank globally for key media freedoms?
Austria ranks 15th and Vanuatu ranks 16th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key media freedoms. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key media freedoms
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 21,793 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which the government directly or indirectly attempts to censor political content in print and broadcast media, through formal restrictions or indirect pressures such as financial control, licensing, or access to distribution channels.