Georgia vs Jordan: Key features of liberal democracy
Georgia
0.275
in 2025
Jordan
0.274
in 2025
Georgia rank
99th
Jordan rank
100th
Key features of liberal democracy over time
- Georgia
- Jordan
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.275 against 0.274 in Jordan, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Georgia ranks 99th and Jordan ranks 100th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.0185 | 0.1048 | 0.0863 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.016 | 0.1532 | 0.1372 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.0144 | 0.1564 | 0.142 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.0196 | 0.1702 | 0.1506 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.0232 | 0.1609 | 0.1377 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.0247 | 0.135 | 0.1103 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.0352 | 0.1499 | 0.1147 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.1716 | 0.1962 | 0.0246 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.2998 | 0.1769 | 0.1229 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.4515 | 0.2211 | 0.2304 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.4077 | 0.2545 | 0.1532 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher key features of liberal democracy, Georgia or Jordan?
- Georgia, at 0.275 against 0.274 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in key features of liberal democracy between Georgia and Jordan?
- 0.001, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Jordan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Jordan rank globally for key features of liberal democracy?
- Georgia ranks 99th and Jordan ranks 100th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Key features of liberal democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, individual and minority rights, equality before the law, and executive constraints.