Eswatini vs Palestine, State of: Key features of liberal democracy
Eswatini
0.097
in 2025
Palestine, State of
0.099
in 1948
Eswatini rank
145th
Palestine, State of rank
142nd
Key features of liberal democracy over time
- Eswatini
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 0.099 against 0.097 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.002.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 145th and Palestine, State of ranks 142nd of 176 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.068 | 0.099 | 0.031 | Palestine, State of |
| 1920s | 0.0699 | 0.1123 | 0.0424 | Palestine, State of |
| 1930s | 0.07 | 0.1112 | 0.0412 | Palestine, State of |
| 1940s | 0.07 | 0.1081 | 0.0381 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher key features of liberal democracy, Eswatini or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 0.099 against 0.097 in Eswatini as of 1948.
- What is the difference in key features of liberal democracy between Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
- 0.002, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Eswatini and Palestine, State of rank globally for key features of liberal democracy?
- Eswatini ranks 145th and Palestine, State of ranks 142nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Key features of liberal democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, individual and minority rights, equality before the law, and executive constraints.