Cameroon vs Congo: Key features of liberal democracy

Cameroon
0.114
in 2025
Congo
0.115
in 2025
Cameroon rank
134th
Congo rank
131st

Key features of liberal democracy over time

  • Cameroon
  • Congo
00.10.20.3190319642025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.115 against 0.114 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.001.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Cameroon ranks 134th and Congo ranks 131st of 176 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 5 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0706 0.1148 0.0442 Congo
1970s 0.0704 0.0284 0.042 Cameroon
1980s 0.095 0.032 0.063 Cameroon
1990s 0.143 0.1836 0.0406 Congo
2000s 0.1554 0.0909 0.0645 Cameroon
2010s 0.1428 0.1002 0.0426 Cameroon
2020s 0.124 0.1172 0.0068 Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key features of liberal democracy, Cameroon or Congo?
Congo, at 0.115 against 0.114 in Cameroon as of 2025.
What is the difference in key features of liberal democracy between Cameroon and Congo?
0.001, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Congo?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Cameroon and Congo rank globally for key features of liberal democracy?
Cameroon ranks 134th and Congo ranks 131st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key features of liberal democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key features of liberal democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 28,671 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent of suffrage, the freedom and fairness of elections, freedoms of association and expression, individual and minority rights, equality before the law, and executive constraints.