Niger vs Rwanda: Key features of democracy

Niger
0.227
in 2025
Rwanda
0.193
in 2025
Niger rank
134th
Rwanda rank
137th

Key features of democracy over time

  • Niger
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.6191619702025

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.227 against 0.193 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.034.

That makes Niger's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Rwanda ahead.

Niger ranks 134th and Rwanda ranks 137th of 176 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Rwanda Difference Ahead
1920s 0.015 0.016 0.001 Rwanda
1930s 0.016 0.016 0
1940s 0.0241 0.016 0.0081 Niger
1950s 0.061 0.0388 0.0222 Niger
1960s 0.1872 0.2176 0.0304 Rwanda
1970s 0.1304 0.1497 0.0193 Rwanda
1980s 0.0988 0.1977 0.0989 Rwanda
1990s 0.3987 0.1624 0.2363 Niger
2000s 0.5448 0.1697 0.3751 Niger
2010s 0.5487 0.2227 0.326 Niger
2020s 0.4038 0.213 0.1908 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher key features of democracy, Niger or Rwanda?
Niger, at 0.227 against 0.193 in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in key features of democracy between Niger and Rwanda?
0.034, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Rwanda?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Niger and Rwanda rank globally for key features of democracy?
Niger ranks 134th and Rwanda ranks 137th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Key features of democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Key features of democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.