United Arab Emirates vs Uruguay: Judicial Corruption Score

United Arab Emirates
1.85
in 2025
Uruguay
2
in 2025
United Arab Emirates rank
25th
Uruguay rank
23rd

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • United Arab Emirates
  • Uruguay
-10123182519252025

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 2 against 1.85 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.15.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Uruguay ahead.

United Arab Emirates ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 176 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Arab Emirates Uruguay Difference Ahead
1970s 0.8658 1.56 0.6926 Uruguay
1980s 1.1 1.82 0.7195 Uruguay
1990s 1.55 2.25 0.6994 Uruguay
2000s 1.91 2.25 0.3384 Uruguay
2010s 2.17 2.23 0.0658 Uruguay
2020s 1.9 2.3 0.3958 Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, United Arab Emirates or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 2 against 1.85 in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between United Arab Emirates and Uruguay?
0.15, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Uruguay?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do United Arab Emirates and Uruguay rank globally for judicial corruption score?
United Arab Emirates ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.