United Arab Emirates vs United Kingdom: Judicial Corruption Score
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 1.85 against 1.75 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.1.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was United Kingdom ahead.
United Arab Emirates ranks 25th and United Kingdom ranks 27th of 176 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, United Arab Emirates averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.8658 | 2.19 | 1.32 | United Kingdom |
| 1980s | 1.1 | 2.19 | 1.08 | United Kingdom |
| 1990s | 1.55 | 2.19 | 0.6404 | United Kingdom |
| 2000s | 1.91 | 2.19 | 0.2794 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 2.17 | 2.15 | 0.0228 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 1.9 | 1.75 | 0.152 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, United Arab Emirates or United Kingdom?
- United Arab Emirates, at 1.85 against 1.75 in United Kingdom as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom?
- 0.1, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 25th and United Kingdom ranks 27th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.