Saudi Arabia vs East Timor: Judicial Corruption Score
Saudi Arabia
0.569
in 2025
East Timor
0.611
in 2025
Saudi Arabia rank
77th
East Timor rank
75th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 0.611 against 0.569 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.042.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 50 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 77th and East Timor ranks 75th of 176 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.18 | 1.23 | 0.056 | East Timor |
| 1980s | 1.18 | 1.23 | 0.056 | East Timor |
| 1990s | 0.9338 | 1.23 | 0.2992 | East Timor |
| 2000s | 0.569 | 1.14 | 0.5664 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 0.569 | 0.7669 | 0.1979 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0.569 | 0.961 | 0.392 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Saudi Arabia or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 0.611 against 0.569 in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Saudi Arabia and East Timor?
- 0.042, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and East Timor?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
- How do Saudi Arabia and East Timor rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 77th and East Timor ranks 75th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.