Papua New Guinea vs United Arab Emirates: Judicial Corruption Score
Papua New Guinea
1.82
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
1.85
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
26th
United Arab Emirates rank
25th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 1.85 against 1.82 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 26th and United Arab Emirates ranks 25th of 176 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.9604 | 0.8658 | 0.0947 | Papua New Guinea |
| 1980s | 1.23 | 1.1 | 0.128 | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 1.23 | 1.55 | 0.3166 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2000s | 1.23 | 1.91 | 0.6776 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 1.01 | 2.17 | 1.16 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 1.17 | 1.9 | 0.7343 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Papua New Guinea or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 1.85 against 1.82 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Papua New Guinea and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.03, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and United Arab Emirates?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Papua New Guinea and United Arab Emirates rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 26th and United Arab Emirates ranks 25th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.