Malaysia vs Suriname: Judicial Corruption Score
Malaysia
0.985
in 2025
Suriname
1.02
in 2025
Malaysia rank
57th
Suriname rank
54th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Malaysia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1.02 against 0.985 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.035.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Suriname ahead.
Malaysia ranks 57th and Suriname ranks 54th of 176 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1.12 | 2.09 | 0.974 | Suriname |
| 1910s | 1.12 | 2.09 | 0.974 | Suriname |
| 1920s | 1.12 | 2.09 | 0.974 | Suriname |
| 1930s | 1.12 | 2.09 | 0.974 | Suriname |
| 1940s | 1.12 | 2.09 | 0.974 | Suriname |
| 1950s | 1.3 | 2.09 | 0.7952 | Suriname |
| 1960s | 1.71 | 2.09 | 0.378 | Suriname |
| 1970s | 1.71 | 2.09 | 0.378 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 1.26 | 1.72 | 0.4621 | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.436 | 1.62 | 1.19 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.436 | 1.62 | 1.19 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.6481 | 1.34 | 0.6874 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.985 | 1.21 | 0.2207 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Malaysia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 1.02 against 0.985 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Malaysia and Suriname?
- 0.035, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Suriname?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Suriname rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Malaysia ranks 57th and Suriname ranks 54th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.