Lebanon vs Venezuela: Judicial Corruption Score

Lebanon
-1.52
in 2025
Venezuela
-1.6
in 2025
Lebanon rank
152nd
Venezuela rank
155th

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • Lebanon
  • Venezuela
-2-101178919072025

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports -1.52 against -1.6 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.08.

Across all 108 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.

Lebanon ranks 152nd and Venezuela ranks 155th of 176 countries.

Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Venezuela Difference Ahead
1910s 0.233 -0.07 0.303 Lebanon
1920s 0.233 -0.0748 0.3078 Lebanon
1930s 0.233 -0.082 0.315 Lebanon
1940s 0.233 -0.082 0.315 Lebanon
1950s 0.233 -0.3546 0.5876 Lebanon
1960s 0.233 -1.35 1.58 Lebanon
1970s -0.128 -1.46 1.33 Lebanon
1980s -0.489 -1.51 1.02 Lebanon
1990s -0.489 -1.51 1.02 Lebanon
2000s -0.489 -1.77 1.28 Lebanon
2010s -0.4597 -1.88 1.42 Lebanon
2020s -0.8813 -1.78 0.8972 Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, Lebanon or Venezuela?
Lebanon, at -1.52 against -1.6 in Venezuela as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Lebanon and Venezuela?
0.08, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Venezuela?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Lebanon and Venezuela rank globally for judicial corruption score?
Lebanon ranks 152nd and Venezuela ranks 155th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.