Italy vs Suriname: Judicial Corruption Score

Italy
1.05
in 2025
Suriname
1.02
in 2025
Italy rank
53rd
Suriname rank
54th

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • Italy
  • Suriname
0.511.52186119432025

How they compare

Italy currently reports 1.05 against 1.02 in Suriname, a difference of 0.03.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Suriname ahead.

Italy ranks 53rd and Suriname ranks 54th of 176 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Suriname Difference Ahead
1900s 0.55 2.09 1.54 Suriname
1910s 0.55 2.09 1.54 Suriname
1920s 0.5185 2.09 1.57 Suriname
1930s 0.505 2.09 1.59 Suriname
1940s 0.445 2.09 1.65 Suriname
1950s 0.537 2.09 1.55 Suriname
1960s 0.656 2.09 1.44 Suriname
1970s 0.656 2.09 1.44 Suriname
1980s 0.656 1.72 1.06 Suriname
1990s 0.656 1.62 0.966 Suriname
2000s 0.656 1.62 0.966 Suriname
2010s 0.988 1.34 0.3475 Suriname
2020s 1.05 1.21 0.1547 Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, Italy or Suriname?
Italy, at 1.05 against 1.02 in Suriname as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Italy and Suriname?
0.03, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Suriname?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Italy and Suriname rank globally for judicial corruption score?
Italy ranks 53rd and Suriname ranks 54th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.