Ireland vs United Arab Emirates: Judicial Corruption Score

Ireland
1.92
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
1.85
in 2025
Ireland rank
24th
United Arab Emirates rank
25th

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • Ireland
  • United Arab Emirates
0.511.522.5191919722025

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 1.92 against 1.85 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.07.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 24th and United Arab Emirates ranks 25th of 176 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 2.51 0.8658 1.65 Ireland
1980s 2.51 1.1 1.41 Ireland
1990s 2.51 1.55 0.9644 Ireland
2000s 2.51 1.91 0.6034 Ireland
2010s 2.45 2.17 0.2857 Ireland
2020s 1.92 1.9 0.017 Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, Ireland or United Arab Emirates?
Ireland, at 1.92 against 1.85 in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Ireland and United Arab Emirates?
0.07, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and United Arab Emirates?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do Ireland and United Arab Emirates rank globally for judicial corruption score?
Ireland ranks 24th and United Arab Emirates ranks 25th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.