Iran, Islamic Rep. vs Turkmenistan: Judicial Corruption Score

Iran, Islamic Rep.
-1.07
in 2025
Turkmenistan
-1.09
in 2025
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
132nd
Turkmenistan rank
134th

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
  • Turkmenistan
-1.5-1-0.500.51178919072025

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Rep. currently reports -1.07 against -1.09 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.02.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Rep. has been ahead every year.

Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 132nd and Turkmenistan ranks 134th of 176 countries.

Iran, Islamic Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran, Islamic Rep. Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6317 -1.09 0.4553 Iran, Islamic Rep.
2000s -0.5254 -1.09 0.5616 Iran, Islamic Rep.
2010s -0.7723 -1.18 0.4045 Iran, Islamic Rep.
2020s -1.07 -1.09 0.025 Iran, Islamic Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, Iran, Islamic Rep. or Turkmenistan?
Iran, Islamic Rep., at -1.07 against -1.09 in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Iran, Islamic Rep. and Turkmenistan?
0.02, with Iran, Islamic Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Rep. and Turkmenistan?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Iran, Islamic Rep. and Turkmenistan rank globally for judicial corruption score?
Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 132nd and Turkmenistan ranks 134th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.