Indonesia vs Zambia: Judicial Corruption Score
Indonesia
-0.341
in 2025
Zambia
-0.327
in 2025
Indonesia rank
101st
Zambia rank
100th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Indonesia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports -0.327 against -0.341 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.014.
Across all 115 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 101st and Zambia ranks 100th of 176 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -0.717 | 2.29 | 3.01 | Zambia |
| 1920s | -0.717 | 1.87 | 2.58 | Zambia |
| 1930s | -0.717 | 1.58 | 2.3 | Zambia |
| 1940s | -0.6852 | 1.58 | 2.27 | Zambia |
| 1950s | -1 | 1.58 | 2.58 | Zambia |
| 1960s | -1.68 | 1.11 | 2.79 | Zambia |
| 1970s | -2.63 | 0.799 | 3.42 | Zambia |
| 1980s | -2.63 | 0.799 | 3.42 | Zambia |
| 1990s | -2.4 | -0.3929 | 2 | Zambia |
| 2000s | -0.6334 | 0.0849 | 0.7183 | Zambia |
| 2010s | -0.2913 | 0.5402 | 0.8315 | Zambia |
| 2020s | -0.2355 | 0.4508 | 0.6863 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Indonesia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at -0.327 against -0.341 in Indonesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Indonesia and Zambia?
- 0.014, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Indonesia and Zambia rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Indonesia ranks 101st and Zambia ranks 100th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.