Hong Kong vs Norway: Judicial Corruption Score
Hong Kong
3.11
in 2025
Norway
2.72
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
5th
Norway rank
7th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Norway
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 3.11 against 2.72 in Norway, a difference of 0.39.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Norway ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Norway ranks 7th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 12.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1.68 | 2.28 | 0.598 | Norway |
| 1910s | 1.68 | 2.28 | 0.598 | Norway |
| 1920s | 1.68 | 2.28 | 0.598 | Norway |
| 1930s | 1.68 | 2.28 | 0.598 | Norway |
| 1940s | 1.68 | 2.92 | 1.24 | Norway |
| 1950s | 3.46 | 3.56 | 0.102 | Norway |
| 1960s | 3.46 | 3.56 | 0.102 | Norway |
| 1970s | 3.46 | 3.56 | 0.102 | Norway |
| 1980s | 3.46 | 3.56 | 0.102 | Norway |
| 1990s | 3.46 | 3.56 | 0.102 | Norway |
| 2000s | 3.46 | 3.56 | 0.102 | Norway |
| 2010s | 3.46 | 3.56 | 0.102 | Norway |
| 2020s | 2.93 | 2.72 | 0.2162 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Hong Kong or Norway?
- Hong Kong, at 3.11 against 2.72 in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Hong Kong and Norway?
- 0.39, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Norway?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Norway rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Hong Kong ranks 5th and Norway ranks 7th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.