Guyana vs Malawi: Judicial Corruption Score
Guyana
-0.47
in 2025
Malawi
-0.52
in 2025
Guyana rank
107th
Malawi rank
110th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Guyana
- Malawi
How they compare
Guyana currently reports -0.47 against -0.52 in Malawi, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 107th and Malawi ranks 110th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 11 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1.62 | 1.3 | 0.316 | Guyana |
| 1910s | 1.62 | 1.3 | 0.316 | Guyana |
| 1920s | 1.62 | 1.3 | 0.316 | Guyana |
| 1930s | 1.62 | 1.3 | 0.316 | Guyana |
| 1940s | 1.62 | 1.3 | 0.316 | Guyana |
| 1950s | 1.62 | 1.3 | 0.316 | Guyana |
| 1960s | 1.62 | 0.8332 | 0.7828 | Guyana |
| 1970s | 1.62 | 0.568 | 1.05 | Guyana |
| 1980s | 1.62 | 0.568 | 1.05 | Guyana |
| 1990s | 0.6548 | 0.2077 | 0.4471 | Guyana |
| 2000s | -0.331 | -0.072 | 0.259 | Malawi |
| 2010s | -0.187 | 0.0767 | 0.2637 | Malawi |
| 2020s | -0.2565 | -0.629 | 0.3725 | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Guyana or Malawi?
- Guyana, at -0.47 against -0.52 in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Guyana and Malawi?
- 0.05, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Malawi?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Guyana and Malawi rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Guyana ranks 107th and Malawi ranks 110th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.