Guinea-Bissau vs Kazakhstan: Judicial Corruption Score

Guinea-Bissau
-1.22
in 2025
Kazakhstan
-1.19
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
143rd
Kazakhstan rank
140th

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Kazakhstan
-2-1012190019622025

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports -1.19 against -1.22 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.03.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 143rd and Kazakhstan ranks 140th of 176 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.8884 -0.0347 0.8537 Kazakhstan
2000s -1.09 -1.14 0.0499 Guinea-Bissau
2010s -1.15 -1.28 0.1363 Guinea-Bissau
2020s -1.01 -1.22 0.2102 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, Guinea-Bissau or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at -1.19 against -1.22 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
0.03, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Kazakhstan rank globally for judicial corruption score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 143rd and Kazakhstan ranks 140th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.