Ghana vs Uzbekistan: Judicial Corruption Score

Ghana
-1.43
in 2025
Uzbekistan
-1.51
in 2025
Ghana rank
149th
Uzbekistan rank
151st

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • Ghana
  • Uzbekistan
-1.5-1-0.500.5178919072025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports -1.43 against -1.51 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.08.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 149th and Uzbekistan ranks 151st of 176 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 6 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1900s 0.564 -0.724 1.29 Ghana
1910s 0.564 -0.724 1.29 Ghana
1920s 0.564 -0.724 1.29 Ghana
1990s -0.852 -0.7596 0.0924 Uzbekistan
2000s -1.11 -1.19 0.0815 Ghana
2010s -1.23 -1.25 0.0167 Ghana
2020s -1.32 -1.34 0.0187 Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, Ghana or Uzbekistan?
Ghana, at -1.43 against -1.51 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Ghana and Uzbekistan?
0.08, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Uzbekistan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
How do Ghana and Uzbekistan rank globally for judicial corruption score?
Ghana ranks 149th and Uzbekistan ranks 151st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.