Ghana vs Lebanon: Judicial Corruption Score

Ghana
-1.43
in 2025
Lebanon
-1.52
in 2025
Ghana rank
149th
Lebanon rank
152nd

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • Ghana
  • Lebanon
-1.5-1-0.500.5190219632025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports -1.43 against -1.52 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.09.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 149th and Lebanon ranks 152nd of 176 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 4 and Lebanon in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Lebanon Difference Ahead
1910s 0.564 0.233 0.331 Ghana
1920s 0.564 0.233 0.331 Ghana
1930s 0.564 0.233 0.331 Ghana
1940s 0.564 0.233 0.331 Ghana
1950s -0.33 0.233 0.563 Lebanon
1960s -0.4314 0.233 0.6644 Lebanon
1970s -0.668 -0.128 0.54 Lebanon
1980s -0.9976 -0.489 0.5086 Lebanon
1990s -0.852 -0.489 0.363 Lebanon
2000s -1.11 -0.489 0.623 Lebanon
2010s -1.23 -0.4597 0.7721 Lebanon
2020s -1.32 -0.8813 0.4393 Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, Ghana or Lebanon?
Ghana, at -1.43 against -1.52 in Lebanon as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Ghana and Lebanon?
0.09, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Lebanon?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Ghana and Lebanon rank globally for judicial corruption score?
Ghana ranks 149th and Lebanon ranks 152nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.