Gabon vs Thailand: Judicial Corruption Score
Gabon
-0.082
in 2025
Thailand
-0.158
in 2025
Gabon rank
93rd
Thailand rank
95th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Gabon
- Thailand
How they compare
Gabon currently reports -0.082 against -0.158 in Thailand, a difference of 0.076.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1910 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 93rd and Thailand ranks 95th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 5 and Thailand in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.895 | -0.158 | 1.05 | Gabon |
| 1920s | 0.895 | -0.158 | 1.05 | Gabon |
| 1930s | 0.895 | -0.158 | 1.05 | Gabon |
| 1940s | 0.895 | -0.158 | 1.05 | Gabon |
| 1950s | 0.8348 | -0.158 | 0.9928 | Gabon |
| 1960s | -1.51 | -0.158 | 1.35 | Thailand |
| 1970s | -1.7 | -0.158 | 1.55 | Thailand |
| 1980s | -1.7 | -0.158 | 1.55 | Thailand |
| 1990s | -2.14 | -0.158 | 1.99 | Thailand |
| 2000s | -2.22 | -0.158 | 2.06 | Thailand |
| 2010s | -1.66 | -0.158 | 1.5 | Thailand |
| 2020s | -0.976 | -0.158 | 0.818 | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Gabon or Thailand?
- Gabon, at -0.082 against -0.158 in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Gabon and Thailand?
- 0.076, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Thailand?
- 116 years are reported by both, from 1910 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Thailand rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Gabon ranks 93rd and Thailand ranks 95th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.