Eswatini vs Maldives: Judicial Corruption Score
Eswatini
1.5
in 2025
Maldives
1.51
in 2025
Eswatini rank
41st
Maldives rank
40th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Eswatini
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 1.51 against 1.5 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 41st and Maldives ranks 40th of 176 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1.1 | -0.479 | 1.58 | Eswatini |
| 1910s | 1.1 | -0.479 | 1.58 | Eswatini |
| 1920s | 1.1 | -0.479 | 1.58 | Eswatini |
| 1930s | 1.1 | -0.472 | 1.57 | Eswatini |
| 1940s | 1.1 | -0.469 | 1.57 | Eswatini |
| 1950s | 1.1 | -0.469 | 1.57 | Eswatini |
| 1960s | 1.1 | -0.4814 | 1.58 | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 1.1 | -0.6924 | 1.79 | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 1.1 | -1.34 | 2.44 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 1.1 | -1.38 | 2.48 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 1.1 | -1.44 | 2.54 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1.15 | -1.06 | 2.21 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1.5 | 0.1778 | 1.32 | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Eswatini or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 1.51 against 1.5 in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Eswatini and Maldives?
- 0.01, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Maldives?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Maldives rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Eswatini ranks 41st and Maldives ranks 40th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.