El Salvador vs Niger: Judicial Corruption Score

El Salvador
-0.623
in 2025
Niger
-0.647
in 2025
El Salvador rank
113th
Niger rank
115th

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • El Salvador
  • Niger
-1-0.500.5183819312025

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports -0.623 against -0.647 in Niger, a difference of 0.024.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Niger ahead.

El Salvador ranks 113th and Niger ranks 115th of 176 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Niger Difference Ahead
1920s -0.974 -0.277 0.697 Niger
1930s -0.974 -0.277 0.697 Niger
1940s -0.974 -0.277 0.697 Niger
1950s -0.974 -0.277 0.697 Niger
1960s -0.974 -0.277 0.697 Niger
1970s -1.11 0.2421 1.35 Niger
1980s -1.12 -0.0684 1.05 Niger
1990s -0.8472 -0.0824 0.7648 Niger
2000s -0.729 -0.69 0.039 Niger
2010s -0.6683 -0.2781 0.3902 Niger
2020s -0.6978 -0.5455 0.1523 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, El Salvador or Niger?
El Salvador, at -0.623 against -0.647 in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between El Salvador and Niger?
0.024, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Niger?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and Niger rank globally for judicial corruption score?
El Salvador ranks 113th and Niger ranks 115th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.