Ecuador vs Mali: Judicial Corruption Score
Ecuador
-0.42
in 2025
Mali
-0.486
in 2025
Ecuador rank
106th
Mali rank
108th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Ecuador
- Mali
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -0.42 against -0.486 in Mali, a difference of 0.066.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Mali ahead.
Ecuador ranks 106th and Mali ranks 108th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 7 and Mali in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.116 | 1.41 | 1.29 | Mali |
| 1910s | -0.3786 | 1.41 | 1.79 | Mali |
| 1920s | -0.546 | 1.41 | 1.95 | Mali |
| 1930s | -0.546 | 1.41 | 1.95 | Mali |
| 1940s | -0.546 | 1.41 | 1.95 | Mali |
| 1950s | -0.546 | 1.41 | 1.95 | Mali |
| 1960s | -0.546 | -0.942 | 0.396 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | -0.5554 | -0.942 | 0.3866 | Ecuador |
| 1980s | -0.593 | -0.942 | 0.349 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | -0.593 | -1.04 | 0.4442 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | -0.593 | -1.07 | 0.4785 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | -0.5792 | -1.17 | 0.5914 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | -0.4258 | -1.09 | 0.6652 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Ecuador or Mali?
- Ecuador, at -0.42 against -0.486 in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Ecuador and Mali?
- 0.066, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mali?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Mali rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Ecuador ranks 106th and Mali ranks 108th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.