Chad vs Equatorial Guinea: Judicial Corruption Score
Chad
-1.35
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
-1.31
in 2025
Chad rank
146th
Equatorial Guinea rank
145th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports -1.31 against -1.35 in Chad, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 106 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 146th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 145th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 8 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 3.19 | -0.247 | 3.44 | Chad |
| 1930s | 3.19 | -0.247 | 3.44 | Chad |
| 1940s | 3.19 | -0.247 | 3.44 | Chad |
| 1950s | 3.19 | 0.303 | 2.89 | Chad |
| 1960s | 1.16 | 0.0255 | 1.13 | Chad |
| 1970s | 0.994 | -2.69 | 3.69 | Chad |
| 1980s | 0.8018 | -1.36 | 2.16 | Chad |
| 1990s | -1.47 | -1.36 | 0.1104 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | -1.7 | -1.36 | 0.342 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -1.67 | -1.63 | 0.0419 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | -1.35 | -1.59 | 0.2412 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Chad or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at -1.31 against -1.35 in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.04, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Chad ranks 146th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 145th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.