Botswana vs Qatar: Judicial Corruption Score
Botswana
1.36
in 2025
Qatar
1.34
in 2025
Botswana rank
46th
Qatar rank
48th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Botswana
- Qatar
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1.36 against 1.34 in Qatar, a difference of 0.02.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 46th and Qatar ranks 48th of 176 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1.77 | 0.111 | 1.66 | Botswana |
| 1910s | 1.77 | 0.111 | 1.66 | Botswana |
| 1920s | 1.77 | 0.111 | 1.66 | Botswana |
| 1930s | 1.77 | 0.111 | 1.66 | Botswana |
| 1940s | 1.77 | 0.111 | 1.66 | Botswana |
| 1950s | 1.77 | 0.111 | 1.66 | Botswana |
| 1960s | 1.68 | 0.111 | 1.56 | Botswana |
| 1970s | 1.53 | 0.111 | 1.42 | Botswana |
| 1980s | 1.94 | 0.111 | 1.82 | Botswana |
| 1990s | 1.98 | 0.1584 | 1.82 | Botswana |
| 2000s | 1.98 | 0.269 | 1.71 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 2.14 | 0.2593 | 1.88 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 1.61 | 0.6122 | 0.9978 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Botswana or Qatar?
- Botswana, at 1.36 against 1.34 in Qatar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Botswana and Qatar?
- 0.02, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Qatar?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Qatar rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Botswana ranks 46th and Qatar ranks 48th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.