Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Honduras: Judicial Corruption Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-0.627
in 2025
Honduras
-0.705
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
114th
Honduras rank
116th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Honduras
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports -0.627 against -0.705 in Honduras, a difference of 0.078.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 114th and Honduras ranks 116th of 176 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4494 | -1.02 | 0.5676 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | -0.2342 | -1.02 | 0.7828 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | -0.3718 | -0.9884 | 0.6166 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | -0.777 | -0.7657 | 0.0113 | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Honduras?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at -0.627 against -0.705 in Honduras as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Honduras?
- 0.078, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Honduras?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Honduras rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 114th and Honduras ranks 116th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.