Bosnia and Herzegovina vs El Salvador: Judicial Corruption Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-0.627
in 2025
El Salvador
-0.623
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
114th
El Salvador rank
113th
Judicial Corruption Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports -0.623 against -0.627 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 114th and El Salvador ranks 113th of 176 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4494 | -0.7782 | 0.3289 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | -0.2342 | -0.729 | 0.4948 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | -0.3718 | -0.6683 | 0.2965 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | -0.777 | -0.6978 | 0.0792 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher judicial corruption score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at -0.623 against -0.627 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
- 0.004, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and El Salvador rank globally for judicial corruption score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 114th and El Salvador ranks 113th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.