Bolivia vs North Macedonia: Judicial Corruption Score

Bolivia
-1.57
in 2025
North Macedonia
-1.55
in 2025
Bolivia rank
154th
North Macedonia rank
153rd

Judicial Corruption Score over time

  • Bolivia
  • North Macedonia
-2-1.5-1-0.50182519252025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports -1.55 against -1.57 in Bolivia, a difference of 0.02.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 154th and North Macedonia ranks 153rd of 176 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s -1.24 0.125 1.36 North Macedonia
2000s -1.41 -0.2416 1.17 North Macedonia
2010s -1.4 -0.7169 0.6861 North Macedonia
2020s -1.33 -1.42 0.0892 Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher judicial corruption score, Bolivia or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at -1.55 against -1.57 in Bolivia as of 2025.
What is the difference in judicial corruption score between Bolivia and North Macedonia?
0.02, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and North Macedonia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Bolivia and North Macedonia rank globally for judicial corruption score?
Bolivia ranks 154th and North Macedonia ranks 153rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Judicial Corruption Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Judicial Corruption Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 25,711 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of how often individuals or businesses make undocumented extra payments or bribes to obtain a favorable judicial decision, or speed up or delay the process. Higher scores mean less corruption. A score of 0 is approximately the average across all countries and years.