Sri Lanka vs Uzbekistan: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 4,800 against 3,400 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1,400.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.4 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 56th of 62 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 400,000 | 3,400 | 396,600 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 145,000 | 3,400 | 141,600 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, Sri Lanka or Uzbekistan?
- Sri Lanka, at 4,800 against 3,400 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan?
- 1,400, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
- Sri Lanka ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 56th of 62 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.