North Macedonia vs Russia: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time
- North Macedonia
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 580 against 110 in North Macedonia, a difference of 470.
That makes Russia's figure about 5.3 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 62nd and Russia ranks 61st of 62 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 640 | 80,000 | 79,360 | Russia |
| 2010s | 286.67 | 26,233 | 25,947 | Russia |
| 2020s | 117.5 | 17,192 | 17,075 | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, North Macedonia or Russia?
- Russia, at 580 against 110 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between North Macedonia and Russia?
- 470, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Russia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Russia rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
- North Macedonia ranks 62nd and Russia ranks 61st of 62 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.