Nepal vs Philippines: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time
- Nepal
- Philippines
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 50,000 against 28,000 in Philippines, a difference of 22,000.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.8 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Philippines ahead.
Nepal ranks 40th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 62 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60,000 | 125,000 | 65,000 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 50,000 | 67,333 | 17,333 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, Nepal or Philippines?
- Nepal, at 50,000 against 28,000 in Philippines as of 2016.
- What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between Nepal and Philippines?
- 22,000, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Philippines?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Nepal and Philippines rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
- Nepal ranks 40th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 62 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.