IDA blend vs Serbia: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time
- IDA blend
- Serbia
How they compare
IDA blend currently reports 4.80 million against 210,000 in Serbia, a difference of 4.59 million.
That makes IDA blend's figure about 22.9 times Serbia's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, IDA blend has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 33rd of 43 groups.
IDA blend has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.83 million | 245,000 | 1.59 million | IDA blend |
| 2010s | 3.05 million | 103,900 | 2.95 million | IDA blend |
| 2020s | 4.74 million | 178,333 | 4.57 million | IDA blend |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, IDA blend or Serbia?
- IDA blend, at 4.80 million against 210,000 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between IDA blend and Serbia?
- 4.59 million, with IDA blend ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Serbia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do IDA blend and Serbia rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
- IDA blend ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 33rd of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.