IBRD only vs India: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time
- IBRD only
- India
How they compare
IBRD only currently reports 15.64 million against 530,000 in India, a difference of 15.11 million.
That makes IBRD only's figure about 29.5 times India's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 20th and India ranks 22nd of 43 groups.
IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.90 million | 500,000 | 10.40 million | IBRD only |
| 2010s | 12.50 million | 686,300 | 11.82 million | IBRD only |
| 2020s | 13.26 million | 508,167 | 12.75 million | IBRD only |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, IBRD only or India?
- IBRD only, at 15.64 million against 530,000 in India as of 2025.
- What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between IBRD only and India?
- 15.11 million, with IBRD only ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and India?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do IBRD only and India rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
- IBRD only ranks 20th and India ranks 22nd of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.