Guatemala vs Mozambique: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time
- Guatemala
- Mozambique
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 573,000 against 465,000 in Mozambique, a difference of 108,000.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 21st and Mozambique ranks 23rd of 62 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 245,750 | 33,500 | 212,250 | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 407,500 | 679,667 | 272,167 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, Guatemala or Mozambique?
- Guatemala, at 573,000 against 465,000 in Mozambique as of 2025.
- What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between Guatemala and Mozambique?
- 108,000, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mozambique?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
- How do Guatemala and Mozambique rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
- Guatemala ranks 21st and Mozambique ranks 23rd of 62 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.