European Union vs Nepal: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time
- European Union
- Nepal
How they compare
European Union currently reports 247,000 against 50,000 in Nepal, a difference of 197,000.
That makes European Union's figure about 4.9 times Nepal's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, European Union has been ahead every year.
European Union ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 40th of 43 groups.
European Union has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | European Union | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 203,400 | 60,000 | 143,400 | European Union |
| 2010s | 228,343 | 50,000 | 178,343 | European Union |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, European Union or Nepal?
- European Union, at 247,000 against 50,000 in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between European Union and Nepal?
- 197,000, with European Union ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for European Union and Nepal?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do European Union and Nepal rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
- European Union ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 40th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.