East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Pakistan: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
4.56 million
in 2025
Pakistan
269,000
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
33rd
Pakistan rank
31st

Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Pakistan
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M200920172025

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 4.56 million against 269,000 in Pakistan, a difference of 4.29 million.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 17.0 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Pakistan ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 33rd and Pakistan ranks 31st of 43 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 665,400 1.23 million 564,600 Pakistan
2010s 792,850 767,500 25,350 East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2020s 2.42 million 88,333 2.33 million East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Pakistan?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 4.56 million against 269,000 in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Pakistan?
4.29 million, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Pakistan?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Pakistan rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 33rd and Pakistan ranks 31st of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Pakistan: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /. Statizoid, drawing on Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/internally-displaced-people-idp-by-country-or-territory-of-asylum-origin/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/internally-displaced-people-idp-by-country-or-territory-of-asylum-origin/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/pakistan/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Pakistan: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin
Source
Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
105 places, 1,584 data points, 2009–2025
Last refreshed

Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.