Cyprus vs Pakistan: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time
- Cyprus
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 269,000 against 247,000 in Cyprus, a difference of 22,000.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Pakistan ahead.
Cyprus ranks 32nd and Pakistan ranks 31st of 62 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 201,000 | 1.23 million | 1.03 million | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 226,700 | 767,500 | 540,800 | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 242,667 | 88,333 | 154,333 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, Cyprus or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 269,000 against 247,000 in Cyprus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between Cyprus and Pakistan?
- 22,000, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Pakistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Cyprus and Pakistan rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
- Cyprus ranks 32nd and Pakistan ranks 31st of 62 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.