Bangladesh vs India: Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum /
Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / over time
- Bangladesh
- India
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 583,000 against 530,000 in India, a difference of 53,000.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times India's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was India ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 20th and India ranks 22nd of 62 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 426,000 | 500,000 | 74,000 | India |
| 2010s | 426,600 | 686,300 | 259,700 | India |
| 2020s | 478,667 | 508,167 | 29,500 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /, Bangladesh or India?
- Bangladesh, at 583,000 against 530,000 in India as of 2025.
- What is the difference in internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum / between Bangladesh and India?
- 53,000, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and India?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and India rank globally for internally displaced people (idp) by country or territory of asylum /?
- Bangladesh ranks 20th and India ranks 22nd of 62 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Internally displaced people (IDPs) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, and violations of human rights, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border.