Latvia vs Netherlands: HICP - Mineral waters, soft drinks, fruit and vegetable juices
Latvia
4.9
in 2025
Netherlands
4.8
in 2025
Latvia rank
13th
Netherlands rank
14th
HICP - Mineral waters, soft drinks, fruit and vegetable juices over time
- Latvia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 4.9 against 4.8 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 13th and Netherlands ranks 14th of 31 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.23 | 1.8 | 0.5667 | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 4.66 | 0.77 | 3.89 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.63 | 2.07 | 0.44 | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 6.87 | 6.38 | 0.4833 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher hicp - mineral waters, soft drinks, fruit and vegetable juices, Latvia or Netherlands?
- Latvia, at 4.9 against 4.8 in Netherlands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in hicp - mineral waters, soft drinks, fruit and vegetable juices between Latvia and Netherlands?
- 0.1, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for hicp - mineral waters, soft drinks, fruit and vegetable juices?
- Latvia ranks 13th and Netherlands ranks 14th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- European Central Bank, published as HICP - Mineral waters, soft drinks, fruit and vegetable juices (Annual average rate of change, Eurostat). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.