North Macedonia vs Zimbabwe: Forcibly displaced people
Forcibly displaced people over time
- North Macedonia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 20,860 against 18,065 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,795.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 180 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,502 | 9,857 | 8,355 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 11,488 | 21,372 | 9,884 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forcibly displaced people, North Macedonia or Zimbabwe?
- North Macedonia, at 20,860 against 18,065 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forcibly displaced people between North Macedonia and Zimbabwe?
- 2,795, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do North Macedonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for forcibly displaced people?
- North Macedonia ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Forcibly displaced people. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forcibly displaced people are represented by the sum of (1) refugees (and people in a refugee-like situation) under the mandate of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), (2) refugees under the mandate of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), (3) asylum-seekers, (4) other people in need of international protection, and (5) internally displaced people (IDPs). Situations in which people are reported in more than one of these categories are accounted for, to the extent possible.