Macao vs East Timor: Forcibly displaced people
Forcibly displaced people over time
- Macao
- East Timor
How they compare
Macao currently reports 5 against 0 in East Timor, a difference of 5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was East Timor ahead.
Macao ranks 173rd and East Timor ranks 176th of 180 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forcibly displaced people, Macao or East Timor?
- Macao, at 5 against 0 in East Timor as of 2017.
- What is the difference in forcibly displaced people between Macao and East Timor?
- 5, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and East Timor?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Macao and East Timor rank globally for forcibly displaced people?
- Macao ranks 173rd and East Timor ranks 176th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Forcibly displaced people. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forcibly displaced people are represented by the sum of (1) refugees (and people in a refugee-like situation) under the mandate of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), (2) refugees under the mandate of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), (3) asylum-seekers, (4) other people in need of international protection, and (5) internally displaced people (IDPs). Situations in which people are reported in more than one of these categories are accounted for, to the extent possible.