Eswatini vs New Zealand: Forcibly displaced people
Forcibly displaced people over time
- Eswatini
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 6,732 against 4,925 in Eswatini, a difference of 1,807.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Eswatini's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 135th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,115 | 1,886 | 771.1 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 3,016 | 3,890 | 873.5 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forcibly displaced people, Eswatini or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 6,732 against 4,925 in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forcibly displaced people between Eswatini and New Zealand?
- 1,807, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and New Zealand?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and New Zealand rank globally for forcibly displaced people?
- Eswatini ranks 135th and New Zealand ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Forcibly displaced people. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forcibly displaced people are represented by the sum of (1) refugees (and people in a refugee-like situation) under the mandate of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), (2) refugees under the mandate of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), (3) asylum-seekers, (4) other people in need of international protection, and (5) internally displaced people (IDPs). Situations in which people are reported in more than one of these categories are accounted for, to the extent possible.